Yeah - Becky won - how the judges could ignore consistently under seasoned dishes - burned potatoes and apples that didn't look remotely like an apple I have no idea - they shouldn't be judges. It was disgusting.

I know that it is unfair, but in this kind of competition - it's a reality show - the judges expect more from someone who's had many more years of experience. And also one should not only be able to perform the tasks well, but also try to impress by going above and beyond what is expected to get that extra edge. Andy was better, but didn't impress enough, while Beccy was very good at her age and left a lasting impression on the judges.

Here we go again - Jennifer won this time - after cooking lamb shank that was raw in the middle. Andre was so obviously the better cook - his dishes were far more complex than hers. His only misstep - dumplings that were a little hard - you can't die from that guys!! He should have left them off the plate - but it was obvious that the judges have their own agendas.

@strangebedfellows said:

Here we go again - Jennifer won this time - after cooking lamb shank that was raw in the middle. Andre was so obviously the better cook - his dishes were far more complex than hers. His only misstep - dumplings that were a little hard - you can't die from that guys!! He should have left them off the plate - but it was obvious that the judges have their own agendas.

Guess who is the judges' favourite?

Andy in season 5. Andre in season 6. Both names are derived from the Greek name Andreas, meaning "manlike" or "brave". Do the judges have something against that name?

Wonder Maybe it's too "toxic" for them - being manlike is now a dirty word. Maybe they are being pc and virtue signalling. The difference in those dishes was appalling - Jennifer's was all style and no substance whereas Andre's had both. Maybe it's a male competitive thing - who can urinate the highest. The judges should consist of two men and two women to maintain fairness.