Well upholding or breaking the law has no impact on whether a person is "good". Laws can be unjust. Sometimes, to be a "good" person, you have to break the law. Laws are not morals.
Well upholding or breaking the law has no impact on whether a person is "good". Laws can be unjust. Sometimes, to be a "good" person, you have to break the law. Laws are not morals.
Well upholding or breaking the law has no impact on whether a person is "good". Laws can be unjust. Sometimes, to be a "good" person, you have to break the law. Laws are not morals.
Jimmy seems to think so. That's why he attacked his brother's character during the trial rather than just taking his punishment without a fight.
Good point. As much of an a$$hole as Chuck is, he is completely right about Jimmy. Although Chuck's motivation is petty and based in jealousy and resentment, and not really about the law.
Fifthfreedom 的回复
于 2017 年 05 月 17 日 7:52上午
Well upholding or breaking the law has no impact on whether a person is "good". Laws can be unjust. Sometimes, to be a "good" person, you have to break the law. Laws are not morals.
tmdb38541732 的回复
于 2017 年 05 月 17 日 4:24下午
That's a good point.
tmdb38541732 的回复
于 2017 年 05 月 17 日 4:25下午
Vaughn Negut 的回复
于 2017 年 05 月 17 日 5:57下午
Good point. As much of an a$$hole as Chuck is, he is completely right about Jimmy. Although Chuck's motivation is petty and based in jealousy and resentment, and not really about the law.