Well upholding or breaking the law has no impact on whether a person is "good". Laws can be unjust. Sometimes, to be a "good" person, you have to break the law. Laws are not morals.
Well upholding or breaking the law has no impact on whether a person is "good". Laws can be unjust. Sometimes, to be a "good" person, you have to break the law. Laws are not morals.
Well upholding or breaking the law has no impact on whether a person is "good". Laws can be unjust. Sometimes, to be a "good" person, you have to break the law. Laws are not morals.
Jimmy seems to think so. That's why he attacked his brother's character during the trial rather than just taking his punishment without a fight.
Good point. As much of an a$$hole as Chuck is, he is completely right about Jimmy. Although Chuck's motivation is petty and based in jealousy and resentment, and not really about the law.
رد بواسطة Fifthfreedom
بتاريخ مايو 17, 2017 في 7:52 صباحا
Well upholding or breaking the law has no impact on whether a person is "good". Laws can be unjust. Sometimes, to be a "good" person, you have to break the law. Laws are not morals.
رد بواسطة tmdb38541732
بتاريخ مايو 17, 2017 في 4:24 مساءا
That's a good point.
رد بواسطة tmdb38541732
بتاريخ مايو 17, 2017 في 4:25 مساءا
رد بواسطة Vaughn Negut
بتاريخ مايو 17, 2017 في 5:57 مساءا
Good point. As much of an a$$hole as Chuck is, he is completely right about Jimmy. Although Chuck's motivation is petty and based in jealousy and resentment, and not really about the law.