What the hell was his end game? That made no sense. He went from the most cunning guy on the show with a lust for power, to a guy that wanted to die slowly in his Roman Bath. Lame.
فیلم و نمایش تلویزیونی را نمیتوانید پیدا کنید؟ به سیستم وارد شوید تا آن را ایجاد کنید.
آیا میخواهید به این مورد امتیاز دهید یا به فهرست اضافه کنید؟
عضو نیستید؟
پاسخ توسط TheShredder
در تاریخ ژوئن 5, 2017 ساعت 2:17 ب.ض
I never understood that character. Was he evil, was he kind? Was he manipulating people, was he just trying to understand people? I never understood his motivation, nor agenda. But I liked the character. I imagine that the real Eckbert was more of a tyrant, considering the time and era, and what I know from history. This Eckbert seemed very progressive, almost 21st Century.
پاسخ توسط Urban Commando
در تاریخ ژوئن 7, 2017 ساعت 4:41 ق.ض
Total agree. I liked the character too. That's why I'm disappointed in his demise.
پاسخ توسط SevenHouses
در تاریخ ژوئن 7, 2017 ساعت 1:51 ب.ض
I kind of fell asleep during the last episodes so I will forever remember the chemistry between Ragnar (sigh) and Ecbert.
پاسخ توسط Urban Commando
در تاریخ ژوئن 8, 2017 ساعت 1:53 ق.ض
The two chilling in the Roman Bath saying they are good men but corrupt men was one of the best scenes in the whole series.
پاسخ توسط SevenHouses
در تاریخ ژوئن 8, 2017 ساعت 2:54 ق.ض
I totally agree!
پاسخ توسط SevenHouses
در تاریخ ژوئن 8, 2017 ساعت 7:41 ق.ض
I think you're right. (I would have to watch some seasons again..) But Ecbert and Ragnar did bathe together. I think I liked that scene too, hehe.
پاسخ توسط SevenHouses
در تاریخ ژوئن 8, 2017 ساعت 8:10 ق.ض
Can't get enough of them:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-DtH0mE5fzU
I always did like the ambiguity in Vikings. Many things were up for more than one interpretation.
پاسخ توسط Urban Commando
در تاریخ ژوئن 9, 2017 ساعت 2:29 ق.ض
I guess I got those two scenes mixed up.
پاسخ توسط His Excellency
در تاریخ دسامبر 8, 2017 ساعت 2:41 ب.ض
xxpo?
پاسخ توسط His Excellency
در تاریخ دسامبر 8, 2017 ساعت 4:44 ب.ض
[Clap]