What the hell was his end game? That made no sense. He went from the most cunning guy on the show with a lust for power, to a guy that wanted to die slowly in his Roman Bath. Lame.
Не можеш да нађеш филм или серију? Пријави се да додаш.
Желите ли да оцените или додате ову ставку у листу?
Нисте члан?
Одговор од TheShredder
дана 05. јун 2017. у 2:17 PM
I never understood that character. Was he evil, was he kind? Was he manipulating people, was he just trying to understand people? I never understood his motivation, nor agenda. But I liked the character. I imagine that the real Eckbert was more of a tyrant, considering the time and era, and what I know from history. This Eckbert seemed very progressive, almost 21st Century.
Одговор од Urban Commando
дана 07. јун 2017. у 4:41 AM
Total agree. I liked the character too. That's why I'm disappointed in his demise.
Одговор од SevenHouses
дана 07. јун 2017. у 1:51 PM
I kind of fell asleep during the last episodes so I will forever remember the chemistry between Ragnar (sigh) and Ecbert.
Одговор од Urban Commando
дана 08. јун 2017. у 1:53 AM
The two chilling in the Roman Bath saying they are good men but corrupt men was one of the best scenes in the whole series.
Одговор од SevenHouses
дана 08. јун 2017. у 2:54 AM
I totally agree!
Одговор од SevenHouses
дана 08. јун 2017. у 7:41 AM
I think you're right. (I would have to watch some seasons again..) But Ecbert and Ragnar did bathe together. I think I liked that scene too, hehe.
Одговор од SevenHouses
дана 08. јун 2017. у 8:10 AM
Can't get enough of them:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-DtH0mE5fzU
I always did like the ambiguity in Vikings. Many things were up for more than one interpretation.
Одговор од Urban Commando
дана 09. јун 2017. у 2:29 AM
I guess I got those two scenes mixed up.
Одговор од His Excellency
дана 08. децембар 2017. у 2:41 PM
xxpo?
Одговор од His Excellency
дана 08. децембар 2017. у 4:44 PM
[Clap]