Discuss Mission: Impossible
Discuss → TV Shows → Mission: Impossible → General
Which Was Better: Classic Mission Impossible Or The 1988 Reboot?
posted by Savage918STAFFMOD on August 1, 2018 at 9:44 PM
About 5 minutes ago I was thinking "Maria, why isn't a thread about which version of Mission Impossible was better: The 1966 series or the 1988 reboot?"
So, I'm going to ask my fellow Honorary IMF Agents for your opinions on this subject. The rules are: there are no rules! (I've always wanted to write that ).
Lima-2, Jahyn1111, wonder2wonder, Klondike 6, and anyone else who reads this, inquiring minds (okay, maybe just me) want to know! Please share your thoughts about this!
Reply by Jayhn1111
on November 18, 2018 at 1:28 AM
that was my guess. I wouldn't even count that Casey in the '88 series. She was horrible. They should've gave her another name.
Reply by Savage918
on November 18, 2018 at 6:09 PM
To be honest, I only saw one episode of season one of the reboot. I had the DVD of season two.
OT: Idris Elba is officially "The Sexiest Man Alive." YES!
Reply by mel-boring
on November 18, 2018 at 9:12 PM
I remember an episode from the re-boot with Nicholas Hammond (Spider-Man). It was supposed to be set in Greece. Hammond played a character named Woodward. After seeing that, I was hoping that Edward Woodward (The Equalizer) would show up in an episode as a villain. Last time I checked, Hammond liked Oz so much, he stayed, living in Sydney.
Reply by Savage918
on November 18, 2018 at 9:36 PM
That would have been great to have seen Edward Woodward on Mission Impossible. BTW, as I'm sure you're aware, a lot of people (especially me), want Idris Elba to be the next James Bond. Some people don't. Why? Because Idris is black. However, Robert McCall in the TV series The Equalizer is white. In the movie version he's black. No one has a problem with this (I certainly don't). My point? If Robert McCall can change colors, so can James Bond.