As visible on this archived page of the official site, they are considered as seasons of a single show.

The Fandom is not an official site.

@superboy97 said:

As visible on this archived page of the official site, they are considered as seasons of a single show.

The Fandom is not an official site.

Except it isn't considered as that, it's just a confusing misuse of the word seasons being used like series.

The official home video releases treats them like separate series as well as IMDb: https://www.amazon.com/Power-Rangers-Time-Force-The-Complete-Series/dp/B015I14632 https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0256278/

No one considers Power Rangers to be one long TV show like that and it leads to confusion when searching it up, posters, and ratings for each show.

@TheBigG said:

@superboy97 said:

As visible on this archived page of the official site, they are considered as seasons of a single show.

Except it isn't considered as that, it's just a confusing misuse of the word seasons being used like series.

We need to follow the official site.

The official home video releases treats them like separate series as well as IMDb: https://www.amazon.com/Power-Rangers-Time-Force-The-Complete-Series/dp/B015I14632 https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0256278/

No one considers Power Rangers to be one long TV show like that and it leads to confusion when searching it up, posters, and ratings for each show.

The way it is listed on other sites is irrelevant here.

@superboy97 said:

@TheBigG said:

@superboy97 said:

As visible on this archived page of the official site, they are considered as seasons of a single show.

Except it isn't considered as that, it's just a confusing misuse of the word seasons being used like series.

We need to follow the official site.

You mean the now defunct site? Should it really still be "followed" if it's down now?

@TheBigG said:

You mean the now defunct site?

Yes.

Should it really still be "followed" if it's down now?

Yes.

@superboy97 said:

@TheBigG said:

You mean the now defunct site?

Yes.

Should it really still be "followed" if it's down now?

Yes.

It being down means it's not a reliable source anymore.

And as noted, having each seperate series in the franchise as "a season" is just banal. Should we note Star Trek Deep Space Nine as "seasons 11-18 of Star Trek (1966)" then since it's in the same franchise?

@TheBigG said:

It being down means it's not a reliable source anymore.

No, that doesn't change the reliability of the source. When there are changes after the original broadcast, we continue to follow the way it was originally broadcasted.

Should we note Star Trek Deep Space Nine as "seasons 11-18 of Star Trek (1966)" then since it's in the same franchise?

These series have always been advertised as separate series, which is not the case for Power Rangers.

@superboy97 said:

@TheBigG said:

It being down means it's not a reliable source anymore.

No, that doesn't change the reliability of the source. When there are changes after the original broadcast, we continue to follow the way it was originally broadcasted.

Except that's not how they were broadcasted at all. They've always been done as seperate titles.

Should we note Star Trek Deep Space Nine as "seasons 11-18 of Star Trek (1966)" then since it's in the same franchise?

These series have always been advertised as separate series, which is not the case for Power Rangers.

And again, I have listed official examples of them being advertised as seperate series. As well as streaming services nothing them as seperate entries.

Having them all as one makes no sense.

@TheBigG said:

Except that's not how they were broadcasted at all. They've always been done as seperate titles.

This is not what Hasbro is saying.

And again, I have listed official examples of them being advertised as seperate series.

The official site clearly list them as seasons. So, they should be listed as seasons.