Apspriest The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy

In the last couple episodes, several points are made about Arthur having the question to the ultimate answer in his head, since he was part of the last generations of people on Earth. But so was Trillian. So why no discussion of dissecting HER brain?

Other than the obvious of course: she's hot, and Arthur isn't.

7 replies (on page 1 of 1)

Jump to last post

If I recall correctly, her brain isn't "fresh enough." She left Earth six months before Arthur so her data is "incomplete."

I guess, if that's in the book; been too long since I read it. Not sure that really holds up though, considering it would presumably be genetic and Arthur's genetics hadn't changed since he was born. Neither had Trillian's.

@Knixon said:

I guess, if that's in the book; been too long since I read it. Not sure that really holds up though, considering it would presumably be genetic and Arthur's genetics hadn't changed since he was born. Neither had Trillian's.



While DNA sequence in the genome stays the same as the biological organism ages, there is a continuous process of damage, repair, mutations and recombinations.

The data - memory formed and stored probably via DNA methylation - about Earth at that critical point in time, in Arthur's brain, is more recent (up to date) than that of Trillian.

So, Frankie and Benjy (Lunkwill and Fook) were interested in buying Arthur's brain, because Arthur was on Earth right before it went ka-blooey and his brain may hold the Ultimate Question that the computer was trying to find out.

Actually, Trillian's brain is never mentioned in the book. I forget where I heard she was unacceptable. Trillian was an option in the radio show, but not in any subsequent versions. I suspect Douglas Adams left her out to focus the story back to Arthur.

My overall point about all of this, though, is that apparently the Ultimate Question - even if they had gotten it right - was pointless.

"What do you get if you multiply six by nine?" was obviously pointless.

But the CORRECT question (to get 42), "What do you get if you multiply six by seven?" is also pointless.

The pointlessness is the point.

@Knixon said:

My overall point about all of this, though, is that apparently the Ultimate Question - even if they had gotten it right - was pointless.

"What do you get if you multiply six by nine?" was obviously pointless.

But the CORRECT question (to get 42), "What do you get if you multiply six by seven?" is also pointless.



Frankie: "No, no, too literal, too factual, wouldn’t sustain the punters’ interest."

Nevari atrast filmu vai TV pārraidi? Jāpiesakās, lai to izveidotu.

Vispārējs

s fokusēties uz meklēšanas joslu
p atvērt profila izvēlni
esc aizvērt atvērtu logu
? atvērt īsinājumtaustiņu logu

Informācijas nesēju lapās

b atgriezties (vai pie vecākiem, ja nepieciešams)
e doties uz labošanas lapu

TV sezonas lapās

(labā bultiņa) pāriet uz nākamo sezonu
(kreisā bultiņa) pāriet uz iepriekšējo sezonu

TV sērijas lapās

(labā bultiņa) pāriet uz nākamo sēriju
(kreisā bultiņa) pāriet uz iepriekšējo sēriju

Visās attēlu lapās

a atvērt attēla pievienošanas logu

Visās labošanas lapās

t atvērt tulkošanas atlasītāju
ctrl+ s iesniegt veidlapu

Diskusiju lapās

n radīt jaunu diskusiju
w pārslēgt skatīšanās stāvokli
p pārslēgt publisko/privāto
c pārslēgt aizvērt/atvērt
a atklāta darbība
r atbilde uz diskusiju
l doties uz pēdējo atbildi
ctrl+ enter iesniegt savu ziņojumu
(labā bultiņa) nākamajā lapā
(kreisā bultiņa) iepriekšējā lapa

Iestatījumi

Vēlies novērtēt šo vienumu vai pievienot to sarakstam?

Pieteikties