讨论 The Wire

As we all know from season 3, Bunny - under extreme pressure from Burrell & Rawls to "juke the stats" in his district or face the consequences - came up with the idea of the "free zones" where drug dealing could be controlled rather than banned outright. His reasoning was that the police and the politicians have already lost the war on drugs, and what the police were doing now - arresting hoppers and mid-level dealers - was a waste of time and resources.

So short of actually legalising drugs he comes up with the free zones, this taking drug-crime away from the wider area of his district and have it managed in certain areas. And for a time it looked like a good idea because those former street corners returned to what they once were and ordinary citizens could go out without fear of being robbed or assaulted.

inevitably it all went tits-up when the media got hold of it, and everyone wanted to distance themselves from Colvin's "idiotic amnesty" on drugs, even though, as Burrell pointed out to Mayor Royce, crime stats fell dramatically in the area, and there was lots of support from citizens, shops and organisations for Colvin's idea.

So my question is: was Colvin's "free zone" idea a good one? Could it have worked with more support from the mayor? Clearly the fall in crime stats would suggest it was, as well as making the lives of ordinary people better knowing that their particular neighbourhoods would no longer be infested by dealers, hoppers and drug takers

找不到电影或节目?登录并创建它吧。

全站通用

s 聚焦到搜索栏
p 打开个人资料菜单
esc 关闭打开的窗口
? 打开键盘快捷键窗口

在媒体页面

b 返回(或返回上级)
e 进入编辑页面

在电视季页面

(右箭头)下一季
(左箭头)前一季

在电视集页面

(右箭头)下一集
(左箭头)上一集

在所有图像页面

a 打开添加图片窗口

在所有编辑页面

t 打开翻译选择器
ctrl+ s 提交

在讨论页面

n 创建新讨论
w 切换关注状态
p 设为公开 / 私密讨论
c 关闭 / 开放讨论
a 打开活动页
r 回复讨论
l 跳转至最新回复
ctrl+ enter 发送信息
(右箭头)下一页
(左箭头)前一页

设置

想给这个条目评分或将其添加到片单中?

登录

还不是会员?

注册加入社区