讨论 The Big Bang Theory

I say Amy. She is level-headed, smart and compassionate. And mentally stable.

15 回复(第 1 页,共 1 页)

Jump to last post

I say Howard. This way we’d have Bernie in the driver’s seat to make sure things go as they oughta.

@FormerlyKnownAs said:

I say Howard. This way we’d have Bernie in the driver’s seat to make sure things go as they oughta.

Bernie's kind of scary though! 😁

Foreign policy often requires scary.

But overall Penny might be better. She can be nice and kind and sweet, but still give a kick in the balls when needed.

@Knixon said:

Foreign policy often requires scary.

But overall Penny might be better. She can be nice and kind and sweet, but still give a kick in the balls when needed.

I had thought about Penny, but went with Amy because I think she's smarter. And I don't know if Penny would want to work that hard.

Penny works pretty hard in her sales position, we've heard about that. Plus a president has a large staff to help, Penny would like that too.

If Sheldon were president I wonder if he would have a Council of Ladies instead of a Cabinet.

@Lemons said:

@FormerlyKnownAs said:

I say Howard. This way we’d have Bernie in the driver’s seat to make sure things go as they oughta.

Bernie's kind of scary though! 😁

Yeah.

Which is why I didn’t pick her for the seat at the head of that table.

A big part of the job is the effective use of diplomacy. Think Bernie would fall far short when it comes to that basic political principle. She doesn’t have it in her to do a “Carrot-Stick” workaround. She would be just “Stick”.

@FormerlyKnownAs said:

@Lemons said:

@FormerlyKnownAs said:

I say Howard. This way we’d have Bernie in the driver’s seat to make sure things go as they oughta.

Bernie's kind of scary though! 😁

Yeah.

Which is why I didn’t pick her for the seat at the head of that table.

A big part of the job is the effective use of diplomacy. Think Bernie would fall far short when it comes to that basic political principle. She doesn’t have it in her to do a “Carrot-Stick” workaround. She would be just “Stick”.

I can see Howard softening whatever Bernie's message would be. So I'll give you that.

I notice no one has said Leonard, and yet he's one of the most level-headed of the bunch.

@Lemons said:

@FormerlyKnownAs said:

@Lemons said:

@FormerlyKnownAs said:

I say Howard. This way we’d have Bernie in the driver’s seat to make sure things go as they oughta.

Bernie's kind of scary though! 😁

Yeah.

Which is why I didn’t pick her for the seat at the head of that table.

A big part of the job is the effective use of diplomacy. Think Bernie would fall far short when it comes to that basic political principle. She doesn’t have it in her to do a “Carrot-Stick” workaround. She would be just “Stick”.

I can see Howard softening whatever Bernie's message would be. So I'll give you that.

I notice no one has said Leonard, and yet he's one of the most level-headed of the bunch.

Leonard is too good. He would try to please everyone. Plus, you gotta have someone with, at least, a little “larceny” in their heart.

@FormerlyKnownAs said:

@Lemons said:

@FormerlyKnownAs said:

@Lemons said:

@FormerlyKnownAs said:

I say Howard. This way we’d have Bernie in the driver’s seat to make sure things go as they oughta.

Bernie's kind of scary though! 😁

Yeah.

Which is why I didn’t pick her for the seat at the head of that table.

A big part of the job is the effective use of diplomacy. Think Bernie would fall far short when it comes to that basic political principle. She doesn’t have it in her to do a “Carrot-Stick” workaround. She would be just “Stick”.

I can see Howard softening whatever Bernie's message would be. So I'll give you that.

I notice no one has said Leonard, and yet he's one of the most level-headed of the bunch.

Leonard is too good. He would try to please everyone. Plus, you gotta have someone with, at least, a little “larceny” in their heart.

I think you're right that he would try to please everyone. And it's not easy to be a leader when you don't want to risk upsetting anyone. I guess that's why I picked Amy. She's also a really good person but she has guts.

Leonard got some guts when he had that extra university money to pass around, and spent it on "himself." Maybe he kept improving from there.

Raj (if he were eligible). Not regular Raj. Not '30-Under-30' Raj. It would have to be “Planetarium Raj”.

Along with his other attributes, Planetarium Raj comes across as confident, knowledgeable, personable, humorous, and authoritative. Plus he is able to work a crowd. And, his choice of “stylish” attire over “nerd-wear" makes him even easier on the eyes...never a bad thing.

Raj has - at least sometimes - some style. But never much substance. Which also explains why women are taken in at first, then quickly lose interest when they find out what he's really like.

@Knixon said:

Raj has - at least sometimes - some style. But never much substance. Which also explains why women are taken in at first, then quickly lose interest when they find out what he's really like.

Knixon you're saying a lot of things that I agree with lately.

It is 2020.

Hey smart people come around to agreeing with me, eventually. grinning

找不到电影或节目?登录并创建它吧。

全站通用

s 聚焦到搜索栏
p 打开个人资料菜单
esc 关闭打开的窗口
? 打开键盘快捷键窗口

在媒体页面

b 返回(或返回上级)
e 进入编辑页面

在电视季页面

(右箭头)下一季
(左箭头)前一季

在电视集页面

(右箭头)下一集
(左箭头)上一集

在所有图像页面

a 打开添加图片窗口

在所有编辑页面

t 打开翻译选择器
ctrl+ s 提交

在讨论页面

n 创建新讨论
w 切换关注状态
p 设为公开 / 私密讨论
c 关闭 / 开放讨论
a 打开活动页
r 回复讨论
l 跳转至最新回复
ctrl+ enter 发送信息
(右箭头)下一页
(左箭头)前一页

设置

想给这个条目评分或将其添加到片单中?

登录

还不是会员?

注册加入社区