$27.4B is the amount the NRF estimate people will spend this year on Valentine gifts.
IN ORDER:
Don’t know who these “Others” are; but, I’m guessing they are people. Does anyone find it strange that these people rank lower on someone’s
list than animals?
Anyway, for the procrastinators among us, it’s not too early to start looking for that “tiara”-like gift.
Kan ’n rolprent of TV-program nie vind nie? Teken aan om dit te skep.
Wil u hierdie item gradeer of tot ’n lys toevoeg?
Nie ’n lid nie?
Antwoord deur tmdb45216683
op 2 Februarie 2020 om 12:19 NM
I am going to guess "others" could be people like hairdressers, mailmen, etc. Not close friends, but people you do see on a recurring basis. In which case yes, I'd be more likely to give my cat a Valentine than someone like that.
Antwoord deur tmdb45216683
op 2 Februarie 2020 om 3:15 NM
If Tim-buktu were still on this board I would give him a plate of brownies.
Antwoord deur FormerlyKnownAs
op 2 Februarie 2020 om 3:31 NM
Nice thought.
But, if Tim-buktu is from Alaska, California, Colorado, Illinois, Maine, Massachusetts, Michigan, Nevada, Oregon, Vermont, or Washington; probably bakes his own—daily.
Antwoord deur bratface
op 2 Februarie 2020 om 6:40 NM
🤣
As for 'others', maybe they are referring to a 'mistress'? Also, why would someone give a 'Valentines' gift to a pet? Seems a bit creepy?
Antwoord deur FormerlyKnownAs
op 2 Februarie 2020 om 7:55 NM
Guess some of us look at them and see
while others look at them and see
. Whatever the reasons, retailers love that kind of love; especially this time of the year when it is expected to add an additional $1.5B to their coffers.
As for “mistress”…yes, that is someone you’d buy a Valentine gift for; but, it is not a word you’d ever put out there in the universe…even if you knew it was going under something as benign as “Others”.
Antwoord deur FormerlyKnownAs
op 3 Februarie 2020 om 1:56 NM
Must admit I chuckled when I read that "cat" comment. Then I picked up "TIME" (02/03/2020) and read an article about a guy who sued his Ex for visitation rights for their two dogs. It cost him over $15K in legal fees; but he won. Now he gets to visit with "Marox" and "Winnie" every Tuesday and Wednesday.
I’ve always thought that the “fight over the family pet” was less about how much someone loved their pet, and more about how much they hated their Ex.
Anyway, the article made me curious so I checked online. I was shocked by the amounts some folks claimed to have paid out in pet-custody battles. And, I was even more shocked upon seeing clips (and ads) promoting “Pup-Nups”.
Pup-Nups!? Maybe pet-love outweighs Ex-hate after all.