Discuție The Big Bang Theory

The Cooper/Fowler-Cooper project turned out to be a real clusterF@#! Just how many of these major time wasting missteps does one person get before a university’s beancounters decide enough-is-enough?

I know Sheldon is of some renown; but wonder how long before the BCs start asking: what have you done for us lately?

After all, Sheldon doesn’t have tenure—might there be a moneybag cutoff somewhere?

It seems as if someone could go on researching forever-and-ever and never produce a “concrete” anything.

Is anyone familiar with how such things work in academia? confused

9 răspunsuri (pe pagina 1 din 1)

Jump to last post

As long as Sheldon (and his work) still brings in funding, that's what the Bean Counters would be looking for. If the DONORS ever lose interest, that would likely be the end of Sheldon's employment at Caltech. But it's not something the BCs would just decide on their own.

I thought it was odd that a (very) obscure Russian paper from 30 years ago, would convince Sheldon (and the others) that his/Amy's work is useless. Just because it says "super-asymmetrical" doesn't mean they used the same approach, or that Sheldon/Amy didn't find a solution to whatever had stymied poor Ivan back in the "dark ages." (1978 was before Reagan/Glasnost/Perestroika/fall of the Berlin Wall/etc.)

But, maybe that's something that will come up again before the series finale.

Heck, maybe the author of that paper is the guy who's the janitor at the university now!

Also, with Sheldon's Vulcan hearing, why didn't he just open the door because of Leonard's sighing, talking to Penny, etc?

@Knixon said:

As long as Sheldon (and his work) still brings in funding, that's what the Bean Counters would be looking for. If the DONORS ever lose interest, that would likely be the end of Sheldon's employment at Caltech. But it's not something the BCs would just decide on their own.

I thought it was odd that a (very) obscure Russian paper from 30 years ago, would convince Sheldon (and the others) that his/Amy's work is useless. Just because it says "super-asymmetrical" doesn't mean they used the same approach, or that Sheldon/Amy didn't find a solution to whatever had stymied poor Ivan back in the "dark ages." (1978 was before Reagan/Glasnost/Perestroika/fall of the Berlin Wall/etc.)

But, maybe that's something that will come up again before the series finale.

> Heck, maybe the author of that paper is the guy who's the janitor at the university now!

Also, with Sheldon's Vulcan hearing, why didn't he just open the door because of Leonard's sighing, talking to Penny, etc?

Go Polar Bears !

This is just like the military project story line. A story idea comes up and then is dropped. It just made Sheldon and Amy look even more Sheldon and Amy-ish. Raj and Leonard in the basement was neat but Raj just picking up and obscure Russian paper?

Well Raj said it was referenced in one of the notations they were supposed to check. So in that way it makes sense. But I suspect that much of what they were checking, also referenced other things. That seems to be pretty common for scientific research. So why wouldn't they have followed all of those trails too? Was it just Because Plot? Maybe.

Or maybe they were following other trails too, at least for a while, but it wasn't mentioned, while in the case of that one it was in Russian and they needed help to understand it.

Meanwhile, there are several ways they could go. Including that the janitor did write that paper, or at least was involved somehow, and he knows that the paper isn't really valid for some reason. Maybe they knew that super-asymmetry DID work, but they didn't want Brezhnev to benefit from it? Or something.

In the wedding episode (last season finale) they did "google" for previous research, which probably should have turned up anything EXCEPT an obscure Russian paper. And maybe that's why they made it obscure and Russian: since otherwise they would/should have found it much earlier.

I wonder if Raj might have had a brief flashback to the time he spent in the steam tunnel with Sheldon when he was in that library basement ?

I wonder if Sheldon ever watched Hannah Montana. grinning

I don't get the Hannah Montana reference. Wasn't Hannah Montana mentioned in the show once ?

As for the paper I would have been great if they mentioned that it came from Leningrad Polytechnika, which is where Dimitri the janitor studied.

Yes, when Sheldon and Raj were in the steam tunnel, Raj got Sheldon interested in the Hannah Montana show - because of her secret identity stuff, I think - and Sheldon asked Amy (over their 2-way radios) to get him a dvd set of the show and a portable dvd player to watch them on.

Yes now I remember. Thanks.

I was thinking, it's a good thing Leonard and Raj did the checking. If Sheldon and Amy had gone with a grad student, I think there's a pretty good chance the Russian paper would not have been found. Sheldon would have been so much MORE unhappy if they had published, and THEN been proven wrong.

Nu găsiți un film sau un serial? Autentificați-vă pentru a-l crea.

Globale

s focalizează bara de căutare
p deschide meniul profilului
esc închide o fereastră deschisă
? deschide fereastra cu scurtături de la tastatură

Pe paginile media

b mergi înapoi (sau la părinte atunci când este cazul)
e mergi la pagina de editare

Pe paginile sezoanelor filmelor seriale

(săgeată dreapta) mergi la sezonul următor
(săgeată stânga) mergi la sezonul precedent

Pe paginile episoadelor filmelor seriale

(săgeată dreapta) mergi la episodul următor
(săgeată stânga) mergi la episodul precedent

Pe toate paginile de imagini

a deschide fereastra pentru adăugarea de imagini

Pe toate paginile de editare

t deschide selectorul de traduceri
ctrl+ s trimite formularul

Pe paginile de discuții

n crează o discuție nouă
w comută starea de vizionare
p comută publică/privată
c comută închisă/deschisă
a deschide activitatea
r răspunde la discuție
l mergi la ultimul răspuns
ctrl+ enter trimite mesajul
(săgeată dreapta) pagina următoare
(săgeată stânga) pagina precedentă

Setări

Doriți să evaluați sau să adăugați acest articol într-o listă?

Autentificare