Which is (are) true?
A)Leonard naturally gravitates towards those who do not treat him well.
B)People with a tendency to put others down gravitate to Leonard because he's an easy target.
C)Leonard is treated poorly by those around him for no good reason.
D)Facets of Leonard's personality make him easier to mistreat.
BUT... I think some pieces are falling into place for him...maybe...
1.Leonard continues to work on the dark matter project with Bert. This was mentioned in the last episode.
2.Leonard's down-trodden-ness has really been played up the past couple of episodes (with the focus on his craving of abusive behavior).
3.Sheldon made strides in this episode towards being able to act happy for others when they succeed.
Perhaps the show is setting Leonard up for some major redemption/windfall in the form of some sort of prize/award. Agree?
Не можеш да нађеш филм или серију? Пријави се да додаш.
Желите ли да оцените или додате ову ставку у листу?
Нисте члан?
Одговор од tmdb19868063
дана 07. фебруар 2018. у 4:53 PM
If ONLY Beverly had just said, "Wha-wha-wha-wha-wha" over the years! Think of the psychological damage that would have saved Leonard!
And just because a character is an animal, does not make it a Snoopy. Cinnamon just drools and licks her butt, and Zazzles is MIA.
I guess Penny cold be Woodstock. They both love shoes.
Одговор од znexyish
дана 07. фебруар 2018. у 4:58 PM
Does Woodstock wear shoes? Yes it is too easy to call Snoopy a Cinnamon or Zazzles. So what if we consider that Snoopys doghouse is Cal Tech making Snoopy, Prof. Gablehauser or Pres. Seibert ?
Одговор од Knixon
дана 07. фебруар 2018. у 5:05 PM
Wherever Zazzles is, he's... ZAZZY!!!
Одговор од tmdb19868063
дана 07. фебруар 2018. у 5:06 PM
Of course Woodstock doesn't wear shoes. I made that all up!
As for Snoopy, which character sits atop a red doghouse pretending to fly a plane? It's that one.
Одговор од Knixon
дана 07. фебруар 2018. у 5:07 PM
Prof. Hawking would have to be Schroeder. Sheldon isn't well-balanced enough.
Stuart probably has to be Pig-Pen.
Одговор од znexyish
дана 07. фебруар 2018. у 5:08 PM
Yes of course. Good catch.
Одговор од tmdb19868063
дана 07. фебруар 2018. у 5:08 PM
What proof do you have that Stephen Hawking can play piano?
Одговор од znexyish
дана 07. фебруар 2018. у 5:11 PM
But Woodstock has those cute yellow birds feet. The Red Baron. Watch this you Lemonenial! https://youtu.be/sh-J4GSPgAM
Одговор од tmdb19868063
дана 07. фебруар 2018. у 5:11 PM
Unbathed Raj in his undies eating lobster is Pig-Pen.
Одговор од tmdb19868063
дана 07. фебруар 2018. у 5:13 PM
I know that song well, and believe it or not, I just heard it on Monday.
Одговор од Knixon
дана 07. фебруар 2018. у 5:15 PM
Well, Schroeder can't be Richard Feynman, because Feynman is dead.
But anyway.
For the sake of.. whatever... doesn't Raj have to be Franklin?
Одговор од tmdb19868063
дана 07. фебруар 2018. у 5:19 PM
I already addressed who Raj was. Go up there and read.
Одговор од Knixon
дана 07. фебруар 2018. у 5:36 PM
I've read all of it. There are other candidates for Linus et al. Heck, Kripke is more qualified to be Linus, than Raj is. Token-person-of-color for token-person-of-color, if nothing else, Raj has to be Franklin.
Одговор од tmdb19868063
дана 07. фебруар 2018. у 5:37 PM
I've never seen Raj as a token.
Одговор од Knixon
дана 07. фебруар 2018. у 5:42 PM
That doesn't mean he's not, for the show. Sheldon even said so, directly. When he said that if one of their group drops out, then Stuart might be able to join. Unless it was Raj, in which case they would probably get another "person of color." And Raj nodded agreement too.