Which is (are) true?
A)Leonard naturally gravitates towards those who do not treat him well.
B)People with a tendency to put others down gravitate to Leonard because he's an easy target.
C)Leonard is treated poorly by those around him for no good reason.
D)Facets of Leonard's personality make him easier to mistreat.
BUT... I think some pieces are falling into place for him...maybe...
1.Leonard continues to work on the dark matter project with Bert. This was mentioned in the last episode.
2.Leonard's down-trodden-ness has really been played up the past couple of episodes (with the focus on his craving of abusive behavior).
3.Sheldon made strides in this episode towards being able to act happy for others when they succeed.
Perhaps the show is setting Leonard up for some major redemption/windfall in the form of some sort of prize/award. Agree?
Non riesci a trovare un film o una serie Tv? Accedi per crearlo.
Vuoi valutare o aggiungere quest'elemento a una lista?
Non sei un membro?
Risposta da tmdb19868063
il 7 febbraio, 2018 alle 4:53PM
If ONLY Beverly had just said, "Wha-wha-wha-wha-wha" over the years! Think of the psychological damage that would have saved Leonard!
And just because a character is an animal, does not make it a Snoopy. Cinnamon just drools and licks her butt, and Zazzles is MIA.
I guess Penny cold be Woodstock. They both love shoes.
Risposta da znexyish
il 7 febbraio, 2018 alle 4:58PM
Does Woodstock wear shoes? Yes it is too easy to call Snoopy a Cinnamon or Zazzles. So what if we consider that Snoopys doghouse is Cal Tech making Snoopy, Prof. Gablehauser or Pres. Seibert ?
Risposta da Knixon
il 7 febbraio, 2018 alle 5:05PM
Wherever Zazzles is, he's... ZAZZY!!!
Risposta da tmdb19868063
il 7 febbraio, 2018 alle 5:06PM
Of course Woodstock doesn't wear shoes. I made that all up!
As for Snoopy, which character sits atop a red doghouse pretending to fly a plane? It's that one.
Risposta da Knixon
il 7 febbraio, 2018 alle 5:07PM
Prof. Hawking would have to be Schroeder. Sheldon isn't well-balanced enough.
Stuart probably has to be Pig-Pen.
Risposta da znexyish
il 7 febbraio, 2018 alle 5:08PM
Yes of course. Good catch.
Risposta da tmdb19868063
il 7 febbraio, 2018 alle 5:08PM
What proof do you have that Stephen Hawking can play piano?
Risposta da znexyish
il 7 febbraio, 2018 alle 5:11PM
But Woodstock has those cute yellow birds feet. The Red Baron. Watch this you Lemonenial! https://youtu.be/sh-J4GSPgAM
Risposta da tmdb19868063
il 7 febbraio, 2018 alle 5:11PM
Unbathed Raj in his undies eating lobster is Pig-Pen.
Risposta da tmdb19868063
il 7 febbraio, 2018 alle 5:13PM
I know that song well, and believe it or not, I just heard it on Monday.
Risposta da Knixon
il 7 febbraio, 2018 alle 5:15PM
Well, Schroeder can't be Richard Feynman, because Feynman is dead.
But anyway.
For the sake of.. whatever... doesn't Raj have to be Franklin?
Risposta da tmdb19868063
il 7 febbraio, 2018 alle 5:19PM
I already addressed who Raj was. Go up there and read.
Risposta da Knixon
il 7 febbraio, 2018 alle 5:36PM
I've read all of it. There are other candidates for Linus et al. Heck, Kripke is more qualified to be Linus, than Raj is. Token-person-of-color for token-person-of-color, if nothing else, Raj has to be Franklin.
Risposta da tmdb19868063
il 7 febbraio, 2018 alle 5:37PM
I've never seen Raj as a token.
Risposta da Knixon
il 7 febbraio, 2018 alle 5:42PM
That doesn't mean he's not, for the show. Sheldon even said so, directly. When he said that if one of their group drops out, then Stuart might be able to join. Unless it was Raj, in which case they would probably get another "person of color." And Raj nodded agreement too.