Which is (are) true?
A)Leonard naturally gravitates towards those who do not treat him well.
B)People with a tendency to put others down gravitate to Leonard because he's an easy target.
C)Leonard is treated poorly by those around him for no good reason.
D)Facets of Leonard's personality make him easier to mistreat.
BUT... I think some pieces are falling into place for him...maybe...
1.Leonard continues to work on the dark matter project with Bert. This was mentioned in the last episode.
2.Leonard's down-trodden-ness has really been played up the past couple of episodes (with the focus on his craving of abusive behavior).
3.Sheldon made strides in this episode towards being able to act happy for others when they succeed.
Perhaps the show is setting Leonard up for some major redemption/windfall in the form of some sort of prize/award. Agree?
Не вдалося знайти фільм або серіал? Увійдіть, щоб додати.
Хочете оцінити чи додати до списку?
Немає облікового запису?
Відповідь від tmdb19868063
7 лютого 2018, 16:53
If ONLY Beverly had just said, "Wha-wha-wha-wha-wha" over the years! Think of the psychological damage that would have saved Leonard!
And just because a character is an animal, does not make it a Snoopy. Cinnamon just drools and licks her butt, and Zazzles is MIA.
I guess Penny cold be Woodstock. They both love shoes.
Відповідь від znexyish
7 лютого 2018, 16:58
Does Woodstock wear shoes? Yes it is too easy to call Snoopy a Cinnamon or Zazzles. So what if we consider that Snoopys doghouse is Cal Tech making Snoopy, Prof. Gablehauser or Pres. Seibert ?
Відповідь від Knixon
7 лютого 2018, 17:05
Wherever Zazzles is, he's... ZAZZY!!!
Відповідь від tmdb19868063
7 лютого 2018, 17:06
Of course Woodstock doesn't wear shoes. I made that all up!
As for Snoopy, which character sits atop a red doghouse pretending to fly a plane? It's that one.
Відповідь від Knixon
7 лютого 2018, 17:07
Prof. Hawking would have to be Schroeder. Sheldon isn't well-balanced enough.
Stuart probably has to be Pig-Pen.
Відповідь від znexyish
7 лютого 2018, 17:08
Yes of course. Good catch.
Відповідь від tmdb19868063
7 лютого 2018, 17:08
What proof do you have that Stephen Hawking can play piano?
Відповідь від znexyish
7 лютого 2018, 17:11
But Woodstock has those cute yellow birds feet. The Red Baron. Watch this you Lemonenial! https://youtu.be/sh-J4GSPgAM
Відповідь від tmdb19868063
7 лютого 2018, 17:11
Unbathed Raj in his undies eating lobster is Pig-Pen.
Відповідь від tmdb19868063
7 лютого 2018, 17:13
I know that song well, and believe it or not, I just heard it on Monday.
Відповідь від Knixon
7 лютого 2018, 17:15
Well, Schroeder can't be Richard Feynman, because Feynman is dead.
But anyway.
For the sake of.. whatever... doesn't Raj have to be Franklin?
Відповідь від tmdb19868063
7 лютого 2018, 17:19
I already addressed who Raj was. Go up there and read.
Відповідь від Knixon
7 лютого 2018, 17:36
I've read all of it. There are other candidates for Linus et al. Heck, Kripke is more qualified to be Linus, than Raj is. Token-person-of-color for token-person-of-color, if nothing else, Raj has to be Franklin.
Відповідь від tmdb19868063
7 лютого 2018, 17:37
I've never seen Raj as a token.
Відповідь від Knixon
7 лютого 2018, 17:42
That doesn't mean he's not, for the show. Sheldon even said so, directly. When he said that if one of their group drops out, then Stuart might be able to join. Unless it was Raj, in which case they would probably get another "person of color." And Raj nodded agreement too.