Legally, It should be Bran, the last of the legitimate sons. As Sansa bluntly put it to Jon, "I'm a girl and you're a bastard". The Watch know who Bran is, but they're just sitting on the information. They could make Bran "Lord Stark" and still let Jon be the King of the North.
(Of course, Bran tends to screw things up and would make a terrible head of the family.)
Не вдалося знайти фільм або серіал? Увійдіть, щоб додати.
Хочете оцінити чи додати до списку?
Немає облікового запису?
Відповідь від lmao7
26 липня 2017, 01:01
But isn't Bran the 3-eyed-raven? or will be? or training for it? He was already told by older 3-eyed raven: the time has come for you to become me...
Відповідь від RustyShackleworth
26 липня 2017, 02:31
Good question. I don't know if Bran's status as the Three-Eyed-Raven precludes him from being a Lord or ruler of any land.
Відповідь від Heisenberg12
28 липня 2017, 23:36
Then maybe Bran will live in the cave the three-eyed raven did. He can control the wildlings.
Sansa can marry Snow and rule Winterfell.
Arya is the head stark imo. She's on a mission to rule Westeros.
Відповідь від lmao7
31 липня 2017, 13:39
Well now confirmed lol Bran said he can't be Lord of North as he's the 3-eyed raven. So now he's emotionless?
Відповідь від acf
31 липня 2017, 18:53
Bran is incredibly annoying.