讨论 Adventures of Superman

SPOILERS: I just watched "The Mysterious Cube" and it remains one of my favorites. But I always thought a few things were sort of dubious: getting the Naval Observatory to change their radio time signal, which could really mess up a lot of important things that depend on it; and the crook's using acid to melt the otherwise impervious wall. If acid worked from the inside, it should have been able to work from the outside as well, but the cops never bothered to try it. And near the end, when the crook says, "At least I have one satisfaction. Superman may have beaten me, but he couldn't save Lois Lane and Jimmy Olsen." He's basically admitting to attempted murder, thus piling another charge on him. And he's supposed to be a brilliant criminal mastermind!

2 回复(第 1 页,共 1 页)

Jump to last post

SPOILERS: Hi Gnome. You may recall from IMDb that I pointed out the dialog error in which the crook emerges and is told he emerged too soon. He replies that his clock couldn't have been that slow. But the problem is that his clock was actually too fast, as the police point out to him in a follow-up line of dialog.

I've since done some more research to see if this error was in the script, or was just misspoken during filming. Here's a blurb from the Superman Homepage site: "After Paul Barton is told by Inspector Henderson that he came out too soon, actor Bruce Wendell says, 'That's impossible. My clock couldn't be running that slow.' He is correct because it was fast. His dialog was an error that was left in the script."

There's another problem w/this episode. If someone who is declared legally dead eventually reappears, they are then considered legally alive, and would still be responsible for any past crimes, unless the statue of limitations had expired. (There is no statute of limitations for murder.) For example, this blurb from Wikipedia:

"Although people presumed dead sometimes turn up alive, it is not as common as it used to be. In one case where this occurred, a man named John Burney disappeared in 1976 while having financial problems, and later reappeared in December 1982. His company and wife had already received the death benefits—so, on returning, the life insurance company sued him, his wife, and his company. In the end, the court ruled Burney's actions fraudulent."

找不到电影或节目?登录并创建它吧。

全站通用

s 聚焦到搜索栏
p 打开个人资料菜单
esc 关闭打开的窗口
? 打开键盘快捷键窗口

在媒体页面

b 返回(或返回上级)
e 进入编辑页面

在电视季页面

(右箭头)下一季
(左箭头)前一季

在电视集页面

(右箭头)下一集
(左箭头)上一集

在所有图像页面

a 打开添加图片窗口

在所有编辑页面

t 打开翻译选择器
ctrl+ s 提交

在讨论页面

n 创建新讨论
w 切换关注状态
p 设为公开 / 私密讨论
c 关闭 / 开放讨论
a 打开活动页
r 回复讨论
l 跳转至最新回复
ctrl+ enter 发送信息
(右箭头)下一页
(左箭头)前一页

设置

想给这个条目评分或将其添加到片单中?

登录

还不是会员?

注册加入社区