The Movie Database Support

Hi there,

I've noticed some movie collections that are searchable on IMDb, Criterion Collection, and MUBI, but are missing from TMDB, such as 'The Michael Haneke Trilogy' (also known as the 'Glaciation Trilogy'), 'The Oslo Trilogy', etc. I added them to the collections, but they were somehow removed. I was wondering if this is against policy? Because I really want to help make TMDB more complete and comprehensive.

Thank you for your assistance.

8 replies (on page 1 of 1)

Jump to last post

Collections are only for trues movie sequels.

How is a 'sequel' defined? Take, for example, Director Ang Lee's 'Father Knows Best' trilogy, or Krzysztof Kieślowski's 'Decalogue'. Even though the characters in each film may differ, they all revolve around a series theme and can be considered a collection.

This is explained in the rules here.

I understand the rules, and I raised the questions and the previous examples precisely because there are ambiguities. The two series I mentioned are not sequels in the traditional sense, but they can still be considered collections.

The Decalogue (1989) is a valid collection due to this part of the rule : "Series of stand-alone films and mixed series marketed as proper sequels are also allowed as collections. These sequels are usually numbered and share a similar theme and/or an universe.".

I don't know the "Father Knows Best" movies. So, I can't answer for these ones.

The collections I added share a similar theme but are not numbered, and are still considered collections on other platforms. I hope they can also be considered collections here. Thanks anyway, I appreciate your explanation.

Collections on TMDB are a unique, self-defined concept. So Collections and other terms platforms such as IMDb/Criterion/MUBI use to group films may be completely different from TMDB Collections.

Honestly, the current “Collections” system should just be renamed to “Sequels”, because that’s what it actually is. The word “collection” suggests you can group related films—same universe, theme, or branding—but the rules say otherwise. You keep emphasizing only direct sequels with recurring characters are allowed, so why not just call it what it is?

It’s frustrating when stuff like Fast & Furious (with spin-offs) or Saw (with changing casts and loose continuity) are allowed, but something like Cloverfield or Eastrail 177—which are marketed and perceived as connected—isn’t. Either apply the rules consistently or just be clear that this feature is strictly for sequels, not general groupings.

A simple rename to “Sequels” would avoid confusion and stop people from wasting time trying to submit valid groupings that will just get rejected anyway.

Can't find a movie or TV show? Login to create it.

Global

s focus the search bar
p open profile menu
esc close an open window
? open keyboard shortcut window

On media pages

b go back (or to parent when applicable)
e go to edit page

On TV season pages

(right arrow) go to next season
(left arrow) go to previous season

On TV episode pages

(right arrow) go to next episode
(left arrow) go to previous episode

On all image pages

a open add image window

On all edit pages

t open translation selector
ctrl+ s submit form

On discussion pages

n create new discussion
w toggle watching status
p toggle public/private
c toggle close/open
a open activity
r reply to discussion
l go to last reply
ctrl+ enter submit your message
(right arrow) next page
(left arrow) previous page

Settings

Want to rate or add this item to a list?

Login