Item: Godzilla Collection
Language: en-US
Type of Problem: Incorrect_content
Extra Details: Please Add Kong: Skull Island (2017) To the Movie Set Collection
Es fehlt ein Film oder eine Serie? Logge dich ein zum Ergänzen.
Diesen Eintrag bewerten oder zu einer Liste hinzufügen?
Kein Mitglied?
Antwort von Banana
am 2. April 2021 um 18:50
Please read the Collection guidelines in the Contribution Bible. Kong: Skull Island is not a sequel to Godzilla.
Antwort von jogi1986
am 4. September 2021 um 05:00
Please Add Kong: Skull Island tho the MonsterVerse Collection. This Film is a Part of them. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kong:_Skull_Island https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MonsterVerse
Antwort von superboy97
am 4. September 2021 um 05:15
This is not the Monsterverse collection, but the Godzilla collection. And, as answered above by @banana_girl , "Kong: Skull Island" isn't a sequel to Godzilla.
I invite you to read our collection rules.
Antwort von jogi1986
am 18. Januar 2022 um 08:16
please, add Skull Island to the Godzilla Collection. This Movie is a Part of them. Or make a Monsterverse Collection. Kong Skull Island is definitely a part of this collection, i say only "Monarch"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MonsterVerse https://godzilla.fandom.com/wiki/Skull_Island_(MonsterVerse) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kong:_Skull_Island
Antwort von binpls
am 23. September 2023 um 09:38
@superboy97 I agree that Kong: Skull Island is not a sequel to Godzilla, however Godzilla vs. Kong is a sequel to both Kong: Skull Island & Godzilla: King of the Monsters. How do you decide which movie it gets grouped into?
Antwort von Jim Stark
am 23. September 2023 um 13:12
Well, here https://www.themoviedb.org/collection/86486-spy-kids-collection/discuss/650e8fdbf29d6600e25770b5 the film which is not a sequel to previous films is considered valid to be added to a collection. Why does the Skull Island situation have to be different?
Antwort von ankurmittal1989
am 27. Januar 2024 um 14:56
That is why you need to allow movies to be part of multiple collections as movies can be connected and then we can get a sequel for both together
Antwort von DarkRay
am 16. März 2024 um 11:17
That's the problem, it's not the godzilla collection, it's the monsterverse collection, and the last 2 godzilla and kong movies are part of the monsterverse. The 2 godzilla movies and the kong movie are prequels to "Godzilla vs. Kong" and "Godzilla and Kong: New empire".
The movies can't be more than one collection, and making a collection of only godzilla is a mistake, at least until the option to group movies by universes is implemented. In all the movies there is Monarch, they are from the same universe, and the 2 lines of kong and godzilla movies have ended up joining in 2 final movies.
Antwort von GrimReaper76
am 13. Mai 2024 um 08:45
Godzilla x Kong: The New Empire should be a part of Godzilla Collection and not Kong Collection, as it is direct sequel to 2021 Godzilla vs. Kong.
Ideally, there'd be only a single MonsterVerse collection with both of those collections combined, as said:
Antwort von jsonting
am 23. Mai 2024 um 16:06
Wow.. I guess you must be asleep while watching the movie.. or if you even watch it. You guys just can’t comprehend the idea of collection can you?
I cringe when I see how you guys did the same to DC universe and marvel universe. Geez…. Wake up you guys
Antwort von Banana
am 23. Mai 2024 um 16:31
The plan has always been to combine everything under a MonsterVerse UNIVERSE when the feature is released. Just like we're gonna do for the DC or Marvel movies. I don't know how many times we can repeat that collections were created to group sequels together, and it's only the first step in grouping items.
Antwort von WoodenDuke
am 17. November 2024 um 11:20
Sorry to open this again... But isn't that really a logical error in this case?
If they had introduced Kong and Godzilla separately in the first film and then continued with Kong vs Godzilla in the second film, it would be a collection. Now they first introduced Godzilla in one film, then introduced Kong in the second film, and then brought them both together in the third film. And so it's no longer a collection?
With Marvel or DC it's something different, it doesn't follow a general timeline and is a loose bundle. But in my opinion this collection doesn't behave that way.
If I read the rules correctly, this should apply here: “Series of standalone films and mixed series marketed as actual sequels are also permitted as collections. These sequels are usually numbered and have a similar theme and/or universe.”
Unfortunately I don't understand that. Or should I just understand this as a merging of two film series? I just want this to be clear to myself so that I can classify it better in the future.