Discuție Godzilla Collection

Item: Godzilla Collection

Language: en-US

Type of Problem: Incorrect_content

Extra Details: Please Add Kong: Skull Island (2017) To the Movie Set Collection

12 răspunsuri (pe pagina 1 din 1)

Jump to last post

Please read the Collection guidelines in the Contribution Bible. Kong: Skull Island is not a sequel to Godzilla.

Please Add Kong: Skull Island tho the MonsterVerse Collection. This Film is a Part of them. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kong:_Skull_Island https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MonsterVerse

This is not the Monsterverse collection, but the Godzilla collection. And, as answered above by @banana_girl , "Kong: Skull Island" isn't a sequel to Godzilla.

I invite you to read our collection rules.

please, add Skull Island to the Godzilla Collection. This Movie is a Part of them. Or make a Monsterverse Collection. Kong Skull Island is definitely a part of this collection, i say only "Monarch"

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MonsterVerse https://godzilla.fandom.com/wiki/Skull_Island_(MonsterVerse) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kong:_Skull_Island

@superboy97 I agree that Kong: Skull Island is not a sequel to Godzilla, however Godzilla vs. Kong is a sequel to both Kong: Skull Island & Godzilla: King of the Monsters. How do you decide which movie it gets grouped into?

Well, here https://www.themoviedb.org/collection/86486-spy-kids-collection/discuss/650e8fdbf29d6600e25770b5 the film which is not a sequel to previous films is considered valid to be added to a collection. Why does the Skull Island situation have to be different?

That is why you need to allow movies to be part of multiple collections as movies can be connected and then we can get a sequel for both together

@superboy97 said:

This is not the Monsterverse collection, but the Godzilla collection. And, as answered above by @banana_girl , "Kong: Skull Island" isn't a sequel to Godzilla.

I invite you to read our collection rules.

That's the problem, it's not the godzilla collection, it's the monsterverse collection, and the last 2 godzilla and kong movies are part of the monsterverse. The 2 godzilla movies and the kong movie are prequels to "Godzilla vs. Kong" and "Godzilla and Kong: New empire".

The movies can't be more than one collection, and making a collection of only godzilla is a mistake, at least until the option to group movies by universes is implemented. In all the movies there is Monarch, they are from the same universe, and the 2 lines of kong and godzilla movies have ended up joining in 2 final movies.

Godzilla x Kong: The New Empire should be a part of Godzilla Collection and not Kong Collection, as it is direct sequel to 2021 Godzilla vs. Kong.

Ideally, there'd be only a single MonsterVerse collection with both of those collections combined, as said:

@jogi1986 said:

Or make a Monsterverse Collection.

@banana_girl said:

Please read the Collection guidelines in the Contribution Bible. Kong: Skull Island is not a sequel to Godzilla.

Wow.. I guess you must be asleep while watching the movie.. or if you even watch it. You guys just can’t comprehend the idea of collection can you?

I cringe when I see how you guys did the same to DC universe and marvel universe. Geez…. Wake up you guys

The plan has always been to combine everything under a MonsterVerse UNIVERSE when the feature is released. Just like we're gonna do for the DC or Marvel movies. I don't know how many times we can repeat that collections were created to group sequels together, and it's only the first step in grouping items. man_shrugging_tone1

Sorry to open this again... But isn't that really a logical error in this case?

If they had introduced Kong and Godzilla separately in the first film and then continued with Kong vs Godzilla in the second film, it would be a collection. Now they first introduced Godzilla in one film, then introduced Kong in the second film, and then brought them both together in the third film. And so it's no longer a collection?

With Marvel or DC it's something different, it doesn't follow a general timeline and is a loose bundle. But in my opinion this collection doesn't behave that way.

If I read the rules correctly, this should apply here: “Series of standalone films and mixed series marketed as actual sequels are also permitted as collections. These sequels are usually numbered and have a similar theme and/or universe.”

Unfortunately I don't understand that. Or should I just understand this as a merging of two film series? I just want this to be clear to myself so that I can classify it better in the future.

Nu găsiți un film sau un serial? Autentificați-vă pentru a-l crea.

Globale

s focalizează bara de căutare
p deschide meniul profilului
esc închide o fereastră deschisă
? deschide fereastra cu scurtături de la tastatură

Pe paginile media

b mergi înapoi (sau la părinte atunci când este cazul)
e mergi la pagina de editare

Pe paginile sezoanelor filmelor seriale

(săgeată dreapta) mergi la sezonul următor
(săgeată stânga) mergi la sezonul precedent

Pe paginile episoadelor filmelor seriale

(săgeată dreapta) mergi la episodul următor
(săgeată stânga) mergi la episodul precedent

Pe toate paginile de imagini

a deschide fereastra pentru adăugarea de imagini

Pe toate paginile de editare

t deschide selectorul de traduceri
ctrl+ s trimite formularul

Pe paginile de discuții

n crează o discuție nouă
w comută starea de vizionare
p comută publică/privată
c comută închisă/deschisă
a deschide activitatea
r răspunde la discuție
l mergi la ultimul răspuns
ctrl+ enter trimite mesajul
(săgeată dreapta) pagina următoare
(săgeată stânga) pagina precedentă

Setări

Doriți să evaluați sau să adăugați acest articol într-o listă?

Autentificare