Discuss Star Trek: The Next Generation Collection

Item: Raumschiff Enterprise - Die n�ste Generation

Language: de

Type of Problem: Incorrect_content

Extra Details: I can not agree this splitted up collection between TOS movies and TNG movies. The Star Trek Movies I - X are one historical line and the Connection between the tv Shows tos and tng. It would be better to let the movies I - X together in one collection and start a second collection with the 'new' star trek universe from J.J. Abrams with Star Trek XI and above. Everyone who Needs to split up tos / tng may use the list function, please.

For example Star Trek VII: Generations... this one contains Captain Kirk and Captain Picard. It's partially TOS and partially TNG. Star Trek X: Nemesis contains the Souvereign Class Command Ship as Enterprise-E and not the Galaxy Class Enterprise-D ... should this be split up too, because there's a newer vessel?

2 replies (on page 1 of 1)

Jump to last post

Hi,

Although I am not the person who split these into two collections, I can try to answer this because it seems like there's a good reason why they are split.

As you have alluded, both the TOS and TNG films share the same common universe, have crossover elements, and continuity; but they are in fact a distinct film series from one another. Remember, TNG is a spin-off TV series from TOS, and these films continue that tradition into the film series with the same cast. I think an analogy would be The Lord of the Rings trilogy film series and The Hobbit trilogy film series - same universe, many of the same characters, perfect continuity, but two sets of distinct film series.

Most importantly, there's a lot of sources from creators of the film calling Generations a spin-off film series that use the past characters to bridge the past and present in Generations. That is, they are acknowledging it is a different film series [within the same universe].

I think another clue that TNG is a distinct film series (not that it needs once since the creators acknowledge it) is the sequel numbering in the official titles stopped at Generations.

I suppose it could also be possible the film is both a kind of sequel and the beginning of a new film series. Although it's not mentioned in the guidelines, TMDB has a history of often using the film series criteria when the sequel criteria is nebulous on a case-by-case basis.

I hope that helped to clarify why there are two collections. You may not agree with this reasoning, but I suspect that was more-or-less the reasoning used.

Oh, the reasoning sounds very good. Thank you for your time writing an answer to this 'problem'.

But everytime if i try to think about the current solution, even with your declaration, i comte to the conslusion, that it would be better to have one collection and split indeed both generations in listings.

Of course i may be wrong and just don't know this type of Splitting (growing up with Star Trek I - X = movie-series).

Mhm, mhm... ah nevermind. It's not this big deal and perhaps, if i try to open my mind, i could live with this. Your answer was very, very good. ^

Thank you!

.oO(Btw., could someone be so nice to disable this stupid word-proofing?)

Can't find a movie or TV show? Login to create it.

Global

s focus the search bar
p open profile menu
esc close an open window
? open keyboard shortcut window

On media pages

b go back (or to parent when applicable)
e go to edit page

On TV season pages

(right arrow) go to next season
(left arrow) go to previous season

On TV episode pages

(right arrow) go to next episode
(left arrow) go to previous episode

On all image pages

a open add image window

On all edit pages

t open translation selector
ctrl+ s submit form

On discussion pages

n create new discussion
w toggle watching status
p toggle public/private
c toggle close/open
a open activity
r reply to discussion
l go to last reply
ctrl+ enter submit your message
(right arrow) next page
(left arrow) previous page

Settings

Want to rate or add this item to a list?

Login