Oh wow that's a tough call. Well, if I could only choose one, I guess I'd have to say Potter. He was such a gentle old soul and Harry Morgan was great, a perfect choice for the role.
I think I'd have to agree -- Harry Morgan as Col. Potter. One of my favorite episodes was early in his tenure when they found out it was his anniversary and Radar gave him the horse. It was the one seen through the wounded soldier's eyes.
So many, but I'm going with Charles. I think this was a brilliant replacement to the Burns character, and it was fun to see the technically proficient yet snobbish Winchester be such a foil to the unconventional Hawkeye.
Oops ... the episode that was seen from the point of view of the wounded soldier was where Col. Potter forgot his anniversary. Still a good episode. I can't really think of one that I didn't like.
So many, but I'm going with Charles. I think this was a brilliant replacement to the Burns character, and it was fun to see the technically proficient yet snobbish Winchester be such a foil to the unconventional Hawkeye.
I almost went with Charles on this question. He was an excellent foil for Hawkeye and BJ but, underneath that veneer of aloof calm, he had a heart of gold. Definitely a great addition to the lineup.
Wrong, Crazy. DOS was not that great an actor. He makes all uneven actions for Charles. His nice guy actions are merely scripted. They seem to unevenly come out of nowhere.
Wrong, Crazy. DOS was not that great an actor. He makes all uneven actions for Charles. His nice guy actions are merely scripted. They seem to unevenly come out of nowhere.
That would seem to be a writer's issue, not the actor. I think Mike Farrell is a lousy actor but I love his character in this show.
Similar threads happen all the time in the Star Trek forum where different writers and different directors for almost every episode produced inconsistencies with the characters.
Although he was purely just scripted to be a loser mostly (LINVILLE WAS NOT A REAL LIFE LOSER!!!!) the character of Frank was actually incredible. Later (in the show's last 5 years) all the characters were usually dull.
Nu găsiți un film sau un serial? Autentificați-vă pentru a-l crea.
Răspuns de tmdb67572229
pe data de 24 februarie 2017 la ora 11:53 PM
Oh wow that's a tough call. Well, if I could only choose one, I guess I'd have to say Potter. He was such a gentle old soul and Harry Morgan was great, a perfect choice for the role.
Răspuns de Karen
pe data de 25 februarie 2017 la ora 4:05 PM
I think I'd have to agree -- Harry Morgan as Col. Potter. One of my favorite episodes was early in his tenure when they found out it was his anniversary and Radar gave him the horse. It was the one seen through the wounded soldier's eyes.
Răspuns de strntz
pe data de 26 februarie 2017 la ora 10:42 AM
So many, but I'm going with Charles. I think this was a brilliant replacement to the Burns character, and it was fun to see the technically proficient yet snobbish Winchester be such a foil to the unconventional Hawkeye.
Răspuns de Karen
pe data de 26 februarie 2017 la ora 2:30 PM
Oops ... the episode that was seen from the point of view of the wounded soldier was where Col. Potter forgot his anniversary. Still a good episode. I can't really think of one that I didn't like.
Răspuns de tmdb67572229
pe data de 27 februarie 2017 la ora 7:24 AM
I almost went with Charles on this question. He was an excellent foil for Hawkeye and BJ but, underneath that veneer of aloof calm, he had a heart of gold. Definitely a great addition to the lineup.
Răspuns de Benton12
pe data de 18 mai 2017 la ora 4:16 PM
Wrong, Crazy. DOS was not that great an actor. He makes all uneven actions for Charles. His nice guy actions are merely scripted. They seem to unevenly come out of nowhere.
Răspuns de strntz
pe data de 19 mai 2017 la ora 7:52 AM
That would seem to be a writer's issue, not the actor. I think Mike Farrell is a lousy actor but I love his character in this show.
Similar threads happen all the time in the Star Trek forum where different writers and different directors for almost every episode produced inconsistencies with the characters.
Răspuns de Benton12
pe data de 19 mai 2017 la ora 3:02 PM
Although he was purely just scripted to be a loser mostly (LINVILLE WAS NOT A REAL LIFE LOSER!!!!) the character of Frank was actually incredible. Later (in the show's last 5 years) all the characters were usually dull.