Oh wow that's a tough call. Well, if I could only choose one, I guess I'd have to say Potter. He was such a gentle old soul and Harry Morgan was great, a perfect choice for the role.
I think I'd have to agree -- Harry Morgan as Col. Potter. One of my favorite episodes was early in his tenure when they found out it was his anniversary and Radar gave him the horse. It was the one seen through the wounded soldier's eyes.
So many, but I'm going with Charles. I think this was a brilliant replacement to the Burns character, and it was fun to see the technically proficient yet snobbish Winchester be such a foil to the unconventional Hawkeye.
Oops ... the episode that was seen from the point of view of the wounded soldier was where Col. Potter forgot his anniversary. Still a good episode. I can't really think of one that I didn't like.
So many, but I'm going with Charles. I think this was a brilliant replacement to the Burns character, and it was fun to see the technically proficient yet snobbish Winchester be such a foil to the unconventional Hawkeye.
I almost went with Charles on this question. He was an excellent foil for Hawkeye and BJ but, underneath that veneer of aloof calm, he had a heart of gold. Definitely a great addition to the lineup.
Wrong, Crazy. DOS was not that great an actor. He makes all uneven actions for Charles. His nice guy actions are merely scripted. They seem to unevenly come out of nowhere.
Wrong, Crazy. DOS was not that great an actor. He makes all uneven actions for Charles. His nice guy actions are merely scripted. They seem to unevenly come out of nowhere.
That would seem to be a writer's issue, not the actor. I think Mike Farrell is a lousy actor but I love his character in this show.
Similar threads happen all the time in the Star Trek forum where different writers and different directors for almost every episode produced inconsistencies with the characters.
Although he was purely just scripted to be a loser mostly (LINVILLE WAS NOT A REAL LIFE LOSER!!!!) the character of Frank was actually incredible. Later (in the show's last 5 years) all the characters were usually dull.
Un film, une émission télévisée ou un artiste est introuvable ? Connectez-vous afin de créer une nouvelle fiche.
Réponse de tmdb67572229
le 24 février 2017 à 23h53
Oh wow that's a tough call. Well, if I could only choose one, I guess I'd have to say Potter. He was such a gentle old soul and Harry Morgan was great, a perfect choice for the role.
Réponse de Karen
le 25 février 2017 à 16h05
I think I'd have to agree -- Harry Morgan as Col. Potter. One of my favorite episodes was early in his tenure when they found out it was his anniversary and Radar gave him the horse. It was the one seen through the wounded soldier's eyes.
Réponse de strntz
le 26 février 2017 à 10h42
So many, but I'm going with Charles. I think this was a brilliant replacement to the Burns character, and it was fun to see the technically proficient yet snobbish Winchester be such a foil to the unconventional Hawkeye.
Réponse de Karen
le 26 février 2017 à 14h30
Oops ... the episode that was seen from the point of view of the wounded soldier was where Col. Potter forgot his anniversary. Still a good episode. I can't really think of one that I didn't like.
Réponse de tmdb67572229
le 27 février 2017 à 07h24
I almost went with Charles on this question. He was an excellent foil for Hawkeye and BJ but, underneath that veneer of aloof calm, he had a heart of gold. Definitely a great addition to the lineup.
Réponse de Benton12
le 18 mai 2017 à 16h16
Wrong, Crazy. DOS was not that great an actor. He makes all uneven actions for Charles. His nice guy actions are merely scripted. They seem to unevenly come out of nowhere.
Réponse de strntz
le 19 mai 2017 à 07h52
That would seem to be a writer's issue, not the actor. I think Mike Farrell is a lousy actor but I love his character in this show.
Similar threads happen all the time in the Star Trek forum where different writers and different directors for almost every episode produced inconsistencies with the characters.
Réponse de Benton12
le 19 mai 2017 à 15h02
Although he was purely just scripted to be a loser mostly (LINVILLE WAS NOT A REAL LIFE LOSER!!!!) the character of Frank was actually incredible. Later (in the show's last 5 years) all the characters were usually dull.