and how are they different from any AI, like the Doctor?
How come Elnor could knock them out? Aren't they supposed to be as solid and strong as Data?
Can't find a movie or TV show? Login to create it.
Want to rate or add this item to a list?
Not a member?
Reply by Wolf359
on March 31, 2020 at 1:57 PM
I'm talking about the show, about ST: Picard. Not an article, not a review, not a Youtube channel, but the show.
Is that the best you can do? Labeling people, who have a different opinion?
The show.
I'm talking about the show.
The show.
At this point, I doubt you would understand.
It's not a conclusion, it's an opinion. I'm not trying to prove something.
That's what I meant when I said, you take anything that's thrown at you and defend it. They simply took one of the most beloved characters of 'old' Trek and created a show around him. "Look, we have Picard, your beloved captain. Come! Watch!". That just screams desperation.
... (I don't know what to say) What are you talking about then? You're trying to answer a question about synths depicted in the show and you haven't even watched it??
Every company has to make money to survive. Including Rod Roddenberry's company. Btw, what exactly do you know about his financial status?
Keep dreaming. He didn't even like ST in his youth.
I seriously don't get it: you haven't watched the show, but labeling people is ok?? What's your problem?
New or old, I'm pro Trek when it's good.
As if you've written the article yourself. Again, watch the show and state your opinion, instead of labeling and categorizing people.
You're getting more ridiculous the more you speak.
lol
Oh, I don't like DS9 much. I've tried several times to watch it but to me, it's boring af. I prefer a ship and an alien-of-the-week type of story.
That's just your opinion because old-trek is generally considered bright and optimistic, even by your professional writers.
Have you even watched old Trek? Just asking because, you know, you like talking about shows you've never watched.
In my eyes, this show is crap, and it always will be.
How would you know, you haven't even watched it?? What exactly are you defending here? Don't you have anything better to do with your time than going on boards and writing about shows you've never watched?
But let's talk about shows we've seen, shall we?
AND FFS STOP WRITING WITH CAPITAL LETTERS BECAUSE IT'S THE EQUIVALENT OF YELLING AT SOMEONE! CAN WE HAVE A CONVERSATION WITHOUT YELLING AT EACH OTHER?
Get it?
Reply by Wolf359
on March 31, 2020 at 4:22 PM
If you're posting like this for 20 years then you must at least 30 or 40 years old.. and you still believe that? As I've stated in another post, it's called Hollywood talk. They have to talk like that, it's part of the.. well, game. If I would be sitting in that chair next to Wheaton, I would talk exactly the same way he does. You just sit there, say what everyone wants to hear and leave. Maybe he really was impressed, maybe he hated it. Maybe he does it only for the money, he would never admit it. It doesn't prove anything.
That's the thing, I'm not "anti" new Trek. Wouldn't make much sense, because I'm not a producer, just a fan. It's like saying "it's raining, I'm anti-rain". But we're all human beings.. we have to vent somewhere lol.
No, I don't. I don't like the DC universe much, but I like the MCU. So I don't go to any DC board, but I visit the MCU board from time to time. If a new MCU movie would suck (which has yet to be seen) I would take part in conversations and talk about how disappointed I am. And that's what I'm doing here.
I still don't get it. Isn't it much simpler (and healthier) to just watch the show and form an opinion of your own? Because when you start talking about it, people naturally assume that you've seen it.
That's the reason?? YOU DON'T EVEN LIKE STAR TREK, BECAUSE IF YOU WOULD, YOU WOULD WATCH IT NO MATTER WHAT OR WHERE, STREAMING OR TV, AND...
nah, just kidding. Enough talk for today.
Reply by Nexus71
on March 31, 2020 at 4:56 PM
Hey that Dahj and Soji were biological boddies with a positronic brain is not my invention it was something the writers came up with but was never fully explained by the writers so don't blame me for them not keeping to their own continuity even though that premise doesn't make any sense.Also to have androids like Invidia described were far beyonf the ability of Soong or other scientists in that field even the most advanced android in Star Trek ,Ilia in TMP could be identified as an android and that level of technology was far beyond the reach of Starfleet technology that it is impossible for Starfleet to have come up with technology more advanced than that of V'ger.But synths are androids plain and simple . but instead of arguing about that instead one should be discussing the whole dumb anding of Picard where Starfleet suddenly teams up with the synths who want to kill all organic life in the galaxy and fight the Romulans (who suddenly seem to have a fleet of over 200+ ships(where were those ships during the past 20 years and couldn't they have evacuated these Romulan refugees?))who were right in wanting to destroy the synths because they were going to be the end of all organic life in the galaxy WTF?
Reply by Nexus71
on March 31, 2020 at 5:25 PM
Yeah but for that technique to work they needed Data's postronic neurons which no longer exist and you still cannot create something biological from something artificial that is a technology far too advanced for Starfleet several civilizations shown in the various itterations of Star Trek and some who were millions of years ahead of Starfleet didn't have such technology so how can Starfleet in a hundred years have technology that is far more advanced than the technology displayed in TOS episodes like Return To Tomorrow and That Which Survives or the TMP.
Reply by Nexus71
on March 31, 2020 at 5:52 PM
Now you are bringing in fantasy elements into a science fiction show Star Trek is not Star Wars or BSG for that matter and Star Trek was never much a show about Gods (part of the reasons why I stil have issues with the whole religious aspects of DS9 )Star Trek always had the rationale to assume that certain creatures had evolved so far thzt they would look like Gods but never accepted that there is an omnipotent all determining God. Best illustrated by Kirk in ST V "What does God want with a starship? ".Soji and Dahj are not like Pinokio.
Reply by Nexus71
on March 31, 2020 at 6:09 PM
Supernova remnants are just atoms atoms don't have consciousness what you are alluding to is The Force and like I said Star Trek is not Star Wars that was always the difference between the two Star Trek was science fiction and Star Wars was Fantasy.
Reply by Nexus71
on March 31, 2020 at 7:11 PM
Should that be seen as a sign of devine intervention? Or just plain physics
Reply by Nexus71
on March 31, 2020 at 8:12 PM
But that is not the issue we were discussing here it was about starfleet acquiring technology that is so advanced that it surpasses the technology we encountered in Star Trek of civilisations thousands if not millions of years ahead of Starfleet .Sure Data was advanced by Starfleet standards but compared to Ilia he is a plastic robot toy and even Data was too far beyond the capabilities of the likes of Maddox so how on Earth did we went from that to Dahj and Soji is a scientific leap that doesn't make any sense.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N1zdJQqASX4
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vAO5u1mNQkI
Reply by Nexus71
on March 31, 2020 at 8:42 PM
Lt. Ilia was a Deltan on board The USS Enterprise under Kirk while investigating the entity known as V'ger she was killed (or rather digitally copied into V'gers brain ) she later returned as an android to serve as a mediator between the crew of Enterprise and V'ger the android was a far advanced piece of technology way beyond the abbilities of Starfleet technology.
But I think it is pretty obvious that androids are synths the chief of the robot work crew on Mars adresses them as "plastic people".
Reply by Nexus71
on March 31, 2020 at 9:12 PM
It has something to do with those FLOWERS, because the one's DAHJ had in her place also WILTED even before the ZHAT VASH shows up as if they already knew they were on the way even before they got there.
Flowers reacting to danger is nothing new and isn't a clue per se.We had flowers reacting violently when confronted with the Salt Vampire in the very first Star Trek episode that aired The Man Trap.
PLUS we also saw LOTS of them inside of the LAB where SOJI dreams about being the parts of a WOODEN DOLL laying there on the TABLE.
Another reference to Pinokio and Data(since Riker described him as Pinokio in Encounter At Farpoint).
Reply by Wolf359
on April 1, 2020 at 9:29 AM
At first, I thought Dahj was like a Terminator, a machine with synthetic skin, a modern Data so to speak, but in ep 9, they showed as an unfinished golem on that table. After reading posts about biological bodies, I was confused, because Dahj and Soji showed superhuman abilities. Then, in ep 9, we saw different looking synths on Soji's planet. They had Data's eyes and golden skin. Yet in episode 10, Brent Spiner's character, A.I. Soong switched off Kamasutra via remote control (because she killed a synth and freed Narek). Since biological brains can't be switched on and off on demand, I'd say synths (esp Soji) are androids, like Data, with a positronic brain and synthetic skin. That golem thing remains a mystery. Are their bones metal or biological?
I guess they also want us to believe that after creating one, it can't get changed or enhanced because they programmed Picard to live for only 10 or 20 more years. So it's not like he can receive an upgrade or something. Or may he can and will, who knows?
Reply by Wolf359
on April 1, 2020 at 12:04 PM
Agreed. Many things don't make sense in this show, mostly because they were not thoroughly explained. It seems like they didn't have a clear concept of how to structure the show: Data wasn't in the show at first, and the Seven-Rafy relationship was 'improvised on shooting day' (Source).
Yeah, in the final episode, Riker replaced admiral Fucking-Hubris after they already shot the scene with her. Why? Because attracting old fans maybe? (but yeah, it kind of worked, it was good seeing Riker again).
Good point. Maybe she hacked their databanks as she did in ep 1?
Btw, yes, I meant Voyager's Doctor (Picardo). He's an advanced AI. Put him in a body with a positronic brain and voila, there's the next Data.
At this point, I'm not sure what they are supposed to be. See my prev post.
Madox collected a sample of Data's positronic brain and (finally) was able to replicate it.
What bugs me at this point is, Madox and A.I. Soong had Data living in a box on Soji's planet.. and they didn't recreate him, give him a new body?? Btw, "A.I." Soong !?? It wouldn't surprise me if A.I. Soong is actually an android and made out of Data's.. well, data (memories).
Warp drive is at least theoretically possible. Transporter on the other hand... They needed to invent a Heisenberg Compensator to make it work. ...they created the transporter to lower production costs in the first place.
My point is, in sci-fi, going to the extreme rarely makes a good plot. Iron-man is a good example. From the beginning up until Infinity War, his suit was mechanical. Those G-forces should have killed him, but if you get past that, it "looked" believable at least. But after he got his nanotech suit, as a viewer you just go "whatever". That's fantasy land.
Going sub-atomic like in Ant-man? You can come up with time travel, which they did. Time travel and multiverse type stories are (most of the time) a good cop-out tools when you don't have a good story to tell.
True, but if the simulation is perfect is there a point in asking that question?
Good point with the flowers. Maybe they dropped that from the story for whatever reason? There are a few things not explained, just like in Discovery.
Reply by Wolf359
on April 2, 2020 at 11:46 AM
Good question. First I thought, yes, zat vash did it, but then.. "why?", right? Why destroy Mars and prevent the Federation from helping Romulans? Couldn't remember, so I cheated :)
https://memory-alpha.fandom.com/wiki/Attack_on_Mars :
"At the same time however, the Federation's synthetic ban was eventually lifted after it was discovered the synthetics were not responsible for the attack, but rather; it was orchestrated by a secret group of Tal Shiar operatives known as the Zhat Vash whose sole mission was the extermination of all synthetic life."
(they even have a page for those F8 synths : https://memory-alpha.fandom.com/wiki/A500)
No, they just stood around or played soccer.. until they got punched in the face by Elnor.
It was merely green acid, I guess, that burned her skin? Dahj exploded because that rifle she was holding exploded.
With replicators around, they won't need funding I guess? But who knows.
Touche.
True. It's ridiculous.
Nope. We only see the golem machine and the machine that holds Data's data. Picard shuts it down (and kills Data) by removing three USB-stick like keys, one at a time.
I've tried to watch BSG but couldn't make it past episode one because of that constant zoom in they do. It's worse than shaky-cam in Borne movies.
No, they weren't destroyed. We don't even know what happened to Kamasutra.
They still have that device. Soji punched it, but only destroyed the keyboard-thing. The upper part is intact.
To me, the show was a HUGE let-down. But ask away before I forget the show even exists. lol
Nah, they're supposed to be lovers. After Picard died, Seven sat down next to Rios, they talked a bit. They would make a much more believable couple than Seven-Raffi and Rios-Agnes.
I'd say it was primarily because of Picard. He was always pro synth, because he believes they're alive.. because of Dahj, Soji and their connection to Data. In episode 8 or 9, he debriefs and convinces admiral Fucking-Hubris and she decides to send a fleet (right after telling him to shut-the-fuck-up).
I'm not sure they need money. They have replicators and with enough dilithium, they (actually anybody int the ST universe) can produce huge amounts of energy.
At this point, we don't know much about the golem device and the process. Only that they can somehow control the outcome by adjusting the algorithm, like in Picard's case, to determine approx. how long he's going to live.
The emitter was a "gift" from the 29. century. I can't remember the name of the episode, the one where they travel back to the 90s.
He's only an AI, a program and needs a holodeck-like emitter (mobile or not). In one episode they sent him back to Earth through that Hirogen network. The Doctor doesn't have a body, his 'matrix' (whatever that means) residing in the computer memory is all there is.
I remember.. (unfortunately).
It's not shown, but by reverse-engineering it, I guess? He wanted to dissect Data in "The Measure of a Man", but wasn't allowed to. If he were, he would have reverse-engineered the positronic brain tech years ago.
Don't remind me.. it hurts LOL
(What did they do to our beloved characters.. sigh)
I'm sure he was considered at one point. Kamasutra is supposed to be the evil version of Soji.
It looks like he was anti-Picard (he confines him to his room), but they dropped that story and he became a good guy of some sort (by shutting down evil Kamasutra). At least that's how I see it.
Very well, thank you!
(I hope you get the reference)
Of course, yes. It (magically) reads the state, velocity, energy level etc. of every atom and recreates it at a different location. A transporter creates the perfect copy, before disposing of the original.
With tech like that, even in-universe tech like the replicator becomes redundant (unless replicator is a smaller, simpler version of the transporter).
Lawrence Krauss' "The Physics of Star Trek" is a great read. He explains every tech there is in the ST universe in great detail, what's possible and what not. Disposing of human bodies or warp drives would need a tremendous amount of energy. Hence the fictional material 'dilithium'.
I mean, if there's no way of finding out (because it's perfect) why asking? It's like asking if there's a god.
Reply by Knixon
on April 2, 2020 at 5:18 PM
Dilithium doesn't just create energy all by itself. It "channels" a matter-antimatter reaction into forms of energy used by warp engines and other devices, especially for a starship which needs huge amounts of energy in a rather small space, for propulsion. Since TNG also mentions fusion power plants etc, it could be argued that more mundane ship systems are powered from those, rather than the matter-antimatter system.
In any event, just having large quantities of dilithium - and there is some evidence that it can't be replicated, for whatever reason, otherwise it wouldn't still need to be mined and transported by ship in the 24th century - is not a power source. No matter how it may be getting retconned in various trash shows.
Reply by Nexus71
on April 2, 2020 at 10:29 PM
Dilithium doesn't just create energy all by itself. It "channels" a matter-antimatter reaction into forms of energy used by warp engines and other devices, especially for a starship which needs huge amounts of energy in a rather small space, for propulsion. Since TNG also mentions fusion power plants etc, it could be argued that more mundane ship systems are powered from those, rather than the matter-antimatter system.
Correct.The heisenberg compensator put simply is a device that takes care of the Heisenberg uncertainty principle(which has to do with not knowing exactly where protons and neutrons within atoms are at any given moment )