讨论 The Big Bang Theory
讨论 → 节目 → The Big Bang Theory → 一般问题
I'm worried about Leonard
tmdb19868063STAFFMOD 发布于 2018 年 02 月 02 日 1:47下午
Which is (are) true?
A)Leonard naturally gravitates towards those who do not treat him well.
B)People with a tendency to put others down gravitate to Leonard because he's an easy target.
C)Leonard is treated poorly by those around him for no good reason.
D)Facets of Leonard's personality make him easier to mistreat.
BUT... I think some pieces are falling into place for him...maybe...
1.Leonard continues to work on the dark matter project with Bert. This was mentioned in the last episode.
2.Leonard's down-trodden-ness has really been played up the past couple of episodes (with the focus on his craving of abusive behavior).
3.Sheldon made strides in this episode towards being able to act happy for others when they succeed.
Perhaps the show is setting Leonard up for some major redemption/windfall in the form of some sort of prize/award. Agree?
tmdb19868063 的回复
于 2018 年 02 月 07 日 4:53下午
If ONLY Beverly had just said, "Wha-wha-wha-wha-wha" over the years! Think of the psychological damage that would have saved Leonard!
And just because a character is an animal, does not make it a Snoopy. Cinnamon just drools and licks her butt, and Zazzles is MIA.
I guess Penny cold be Woodstock. They both love shoes.
znexyish 的回复
于 2018 年 02 月 07 日 4:58下午
Does Woodstock wear shoes? Yes it is too easy to call Snoopy a Cinnamon or Zazzles. So what if we consider that Snoopys doghouse is Cal Tech making Snoopy, Prof. Gablehauser or Pres. Seibert ?
Knixon 的回复
于 2018 年 02 月 07 日 5:05下午
Wherever Zazzles is, he's... ZAZZY!!!
tmdb19868063 的回复
于 2018 年 02 月 07 日 5:06下午
Of course Woodstock doesn't wear shoes. I made that all up!
As for Snoopy, which character sits atop a red doghouse pretending to fly a plane? It's that one.
Knixon 的回复
于 2018 年 02 月 07 日 5:07下午
Prof. Hawking would have to be Schroeder. Sheldon isn't well-balanced enough.
Stuart probably has to be Pig-Pen.
znexyish 的回复
于 2018 年 02 月 07 日 5:08下午
Yes of course. Good catch.
tmdb19868063 的回复
于 2018 年 02 月 07 日 5:08下午
What proof do you have that Stephen Hawking can play piano?
znexyish 的回复
于 2018 年 02 月 07 日 5:11下午
But Woodstock has those cute yellow birds feet. The Red Baron. Watch this you Lemonenial! https://youtu.be/sh-J4GSPgAM
tmdb19868063 的回复
于 2018 年 02 月 07 日 5:11下午
Unbathed Raj in his undies eating lobster is Pig-Pen.
tmdb19868063 的回复
于 2018 年 02 月 07 日 5:13下午
I know that song well, and believe it or not, I just heard it on Monday.
Knixon 的回复
于 2018 年 02 月 07 日 5:15下午
Well, Schroeder can't be Richard Feynman, because Feynman is dead.
But anyway.
For the sake of.. whatever... doesn't Raj have to be Franklin?
tmdb19868063 的回复
于 2018 年 02 月 07 日 5:19下午
I already addressed who Raj was. Go up there and read.
Knixon 的回复
于 2018 年 02 月 07 日 5:36下午
I've read all of it. There are other candidates for Linus et al. Heck, Kripke is more qualified to be Linus, than Raj is. Token-person-of-color for token-person-of-color, if nothing else, Raj has to be Franklin.
tmdb19868063 的回复
于 2018 年 02 月 07 日 5:37下午
I've never seen Raj as a token.
Knixon 的回复
于 2018 年 02 月 07 日 5:42下午
That doesn't mean he's not, for the show. Sheldon even said so, directly. When he said that if one of their group drops out, then Stuart might be able to join. Unless it was Raj, in which case they would probably get another "person of color." And Raj nodded agreement too.