Which is (are) true?
A)Leonard naturally gravitates towards those who do not treat him well.
B)People with a tendency to put others down gravitate to Leonard because he's an easy target.
C)Leonard is treated poorly by those around him for no good reason.
D)Facets of Leonard's personality make him easier to mistreat.
BUT... I think some pieces are falling into place for him...maybe...
1.Leonard continues to work on the dark matter project with Bert. This was mentioned in the last episode.
2.Leonard's down-trodden-ness has really been played up the past couple of episodes (with the focus on his craving of abusive behavior).
3.Sheldon made strides in this episode towards being able to act happy for others when they succeed.
Perhaps the show is setting Leonard up for some major redemption/windfall in the form of some sort of prize/award. Agree?
Bir filmi veya diziyi bulamıyor musun? Eklemek için oturum aç.
Bu öğeyi derecelendirmek veya bir listeye eklemek ister misiniz?
Üye değil misin?
tmdb19868063 adlı kullanıcıyı yanıtla
7 i 2018 tarihinde saat 4:53 ÖS'da
If ONLY Beverly had just said, "Wha-wha-wha-wha-wha" over the years! Think of the psychological damage that would have saved Leonard!
And just because a character is an animal, does not make it a Snoopy. Cinnamon just drools and licks her butt, and Zazzles is MIA.
I guess Penny cold be Woodstock. They both love shoes.
znexyish adlı kullanıcıyı yanıtla
7 i 2018 tarihinde saat 4:58 ÖS'da
Does Woodstock wear shoes? Yes it is too easy to call Snoopy a Cinnamon or Zazzles. So what if we consider that Snoopys doghouse is Cal Tech making Snoopy, Prof. Gablehauser or Pres. Seibert ?
Knixon adlı kullanıcıyı yanıtla
7 i 2018 tarihinde saat 5:05 ÖS'da
Wherever Zazzles is, he's... ZAZZY!!!
tmdb19868063 adlı kullanıcıyı yanıtla
7 i 2018 tarihinde saat 5:06 ÖS'da
Of course Woodstock doesn't wear shoes. I made that all up!
As for Snoopy, which character sits atop a red doghouse pretending to fly a plane? It's that one.
Knixon adlı kullanıcıyı yanıtla
7 i 2018 tarihinde saat 5:07 ÖS'da
Prof. Hawking would have to be Schroeder. Sheldon isn't well-balanced enough.
Stuart probably has to be Pig-Pen.
znexyish adlı kullanıcıyı yanıtla
7 i 2018 tarihinde saat 5:08 ÖS'da
Yes of course. Good catch.
tmdb19868063 adlı kullanıcıyı yanıtla
7 i 2018 tarihinde saat 5:08 ÖS'da
What proof do you have that Stephen Hawking can play piano?
znexyish adlı kullanıcıyı yanıtla
7 i 2018 tarihinde saat 5:11 ÖS'da
But Woodstock has those cute yellow birds feet. The Red Baron. Watch this you Lemonenial! https://youtu.be/sh-J4GSPgAM
tmdb19868063 adlı kullanıcıyı yanıtla
7 i 2018 tarihinde saat 5:11 ÖS'da
Unbathed Raj in his undies eating lobster is Pig-Pen.
tmdb19868063 adlı kullanıcıyı yanıtla
7 i 2018 tarihinde saat 5:13 ÖS'da
I know that song well, and believe it or not, I just heard it on Monday.
Knixon adlı kullanıcıyı yanıtla
7 i 2018 tarihinde saat 5:15 ÖS'da
Well, Schroeder can't be Richard Feynman, because Feynman is dead.
But anyway.
For the sake of.. whatever... doesn't Raj have to be Franklin?
tmdb19868063 adlı kullanıcıyı yanıtla
7 i 2018 tarihinde saat 5:19 ÖS'da
I already addressed who Raj was. Go up there and read.
Knixon adlı kullanıcıyı yanıtla
7 i 2018 tarihinde saat 5:36 ÖS'da
I've read all of it. There are other candidates for Linus et al. Heck, Kripke is more qualified to be Linus, than Raj is. Token-person-of-color for token-person-of-color, if nothing else, Raj has to be Franklin.
tmdb19868063 adlı kullanıcıyı yanıtla
7 i 2018 tarihinde saat 5:37 ÖS'da
I've never seen Raj as a token.
Knixon adlı kullanıcıyı yanıtla
7 i 2018 tarihinde saat 5:42 ÖS'da
That doesn't mean he's not, for the show. Sheldon even said so, directly. When he said that if one of their group drops out, then Stuart might be able to join. Unless it was Raj, in which case they would probably get another "person of color." And Raj nodded agreement too.