Didn’t Gaga partner with bud light or some beer lol
What does that have to do with pandering? Every artist does endorsements.
If that’s the case shading Christina for endorsing Oreos is you being a hypocrite especially since your fav endorse nasty beer.
I haven't said anything about Christina and Oreos in this thread unless you're referencing comments of mine from literally YEARS ago.
Brand synergy matters. Christina was mocked for her Oreo partnership because it was completely random and didn't have anything to do with her brand. The difference is that Gaga's partnership with Bud Light revolved completely around her music. She did a mini-tour showcasing music from her then-upcoming album while Bud Light did little more than slap their name on the affair.
Didn’t Gaga partner with bud light or some beer lol
What does that have to do with pandering? Every artist does endorsements.
If that’s the case shading Christina for endorsing Oreos is you being a hypocrite especially since your fav endorse nasty beer.
I haven't said anything about Christina and Oreos in this thread unless you're referencing comments of mine from literally YEARS ago.
Brand synergy matters. Christina was mocked for her Oreo partnership because it was completely random and didn't have anything to do with her brand. The difference is that Gaga's partnership with Bud Light revolved completely around her music. She did a mini-tour showcasing music from her then-upcoming album while Bud Light did little more than slap their name on the affair.
Stop the lies! It was recently!
Bud light didn’t help her brand either & it’s just as embarrassing as Oreo.
Didn’t Gaga partner with bud light or some beer lol
What does that have to do with pandering? Every artist does endorsements.
If that’s the case shading Christina for endorsing Oreos is you being a hypocrite especially since your fav endorse nasty beer.
I haven't said anything about Christina and Oreos in this thread unless you're referencing comments of mine from literally YEARS ago.
Brand synergy matters. Christina was mocked for her Oreo partnership because it was completely random and didn't have anything to do with her brand. The difference is that Gaga's partnership with Bud Light revolved completely around her music. She did a mini-tour showcasing music from her then-upcoming album while Bud Light did little more than slap their name on the affair.
Stop the lies! It was recently!
Bud light didn’t help her brand either & it’s just as embarrassing as Oreo.
Last night was the first time I even posted here in months, and I know I did not post about Christina last night, so...
My point was that the Bud Light partnership was about Gaga's music (her brand, what she is most known for) while Christina was just a random celebrity spokesperson for Oreos and it had no connection to her music.
Nothing wrong with performing at Stonewall although it may seem a bit of a pandering. Considering it's Pride month and soon to be 50th anniversary of the Stonewall riots. I think it's a pretty good cause
Nothing wrong with performing at Stonewall although it may seem a bit of a pandering. Considering it's Pride month and soon to be 50th anniversary of the Stonewall riots. I think it's a pretty good cause
I don't think there's anything wrong with it. It's just amazing that she's been more or less completely silent on LGBT issues her whole career, only to go full Born This Way-era Gaga out of nowhere just in the last year.
Nothing wrong with performing at Stonewall although it may seem a bit of a pandering. Considering it's Pride month and soon to be 50th anniversary of the Stonewall riots. I think it's a pretty good cause
I don't think there's anything wrong with it. It's just amazing that she's been more or less completely silent on LGBT issues her whole career, only to go full Born This Way-era Gaga out of nowhere just in the last year.
You have some nerve judging Madonna when your fav made a music video with a known rapists/ pedophiles making jokes about people being rape. Really hope that music video leaks soon.
Nothing wrong with performing at Stonewall although it may seem a bit of a pandering. Considering it's Pride month and soon to be 50th anniversary of the Stonewall riots. I think it's a pretty good cause
I don't think there's anything wrong with it. It's just amazing that she's been more or less completely silent on LGBT issues her whole career, only to go full Born This Way-era Gaga out of nowhere just in the last year.
You have some nerve judging Madonna when your fav made a music video with a known rapists/ pedophiles making jokes about people being rape. Really hope that music video leaks soon.
Christina literally has a duet with a rapist on Lotus; have several seats.
Can't find a movie or TV show? Login to create it.
Reply by tmdb80522280
on June 14, 2019 at 9:45 PM
Didn’t Gaga partner with bud light or some beer lol
Reply by Cherry
on June 14, 2019 at 9:53 PM
What does that have to do with pandering? Every artist does endorsements.
Reply by tmdb80522280
on June 14, 2019 at 9:56 PM
If that’s the case shading Christina for endorsing Oreos is you being a hypocrite especially since your fav endorse nasty beer.
Reply by Cherry
on June 14, 2019 at 10:33 PM
I haven't said anything about Christina and Oreos in this thread unless you're referencing comments of mine from literally YEARS ago.
Brand synergy matters. Christina was mocked for her Oreo partnership because it was completely random and didn't have anything to do with her brand. The difference is that Gaga's partnership with Bud Light revolved completely around her music. She did a mini-tour showcasing music from her then-upcoming album while Bud Light did little more than slap their name on the affair.
Reply by tmdb80522280
on June 14, 2019 at 10:36 PM
Reply by mrjacs
on June 14, 2019 at 10:47 PM
Deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect deflect
Reply by Cherry
on June 14, 2019 at 11:59 PM
Reply by Gfe
on June 15, 2019 at 2:46 AM
Nothing wrong with performing at Stonewall although it may seem a bit of a pandering. Considering it's Pride month and soon to be 50th anniversary of the Stonewall riots. I think it's a pretty good cause
Reply by torontodj
on June 15, 2019 at 3:23 AM
I don't see what the big deal is. Good for her. Madonna performed there and she's performing for Pride.
Reply by snoho
on June 15, 2019 at 4:44 AM
Madonna threw the first brick at stonewall!
Reply by Cherry
on June 15, 2019 at 1:05 PM
I don't think there's anything wrong with it. It's just amazing that she's been more or less completely silent on LGBT issues her whole career, only to go full Born This Way-era Gaga out of nowhere just in the last year.
Reply by tmdb80522280
on June 15, 2019 at 1:14 PM
You have some nerve judging Madonna when your fav made a music video with a known rapists/ pedophiles making jokes about people being rape. Really hope that music video leaks soon.
Reply by Cherry
on June 15, 2019 at 1:23 PM
Christina literally has a duet with a rapist on Lotus; have several seats.